Avoiding SSDI Benefits Denial by Consulting a Social Security Disability Firm in St Louis

Parmele Law FirmParmele Law Firm Blog Archives

The process of claiming social security disability benefits is not a walk in the park. In fact, experts believe almost two-thirds of the claims filed are denied while still in the application phase. The screening becomes more stringent as the application goes through appeals. This is why people often choose to hire legal representation from a St Louis social security disability law firm like Parmele Law.

To get an idea of just how strict the process is, imagine that 1,000 disability claims have been filed. 330 will pass the application phase; 80 more will pass the reconsideration phase; and 342 will get an okay from the court. Ultimately, about 75.2 percent of the 1,000 claims will qualify for the social security disability benefits without asking the Appeals Council to conduct a review. Should the hearing deny your benefits, the Appeals Council (98 percent rejection rate) or a Federal Court (70 percent rejection rate) are the final hope for your claim.

The application process, itself, is so daunting that most people opt to seek help from a social security disability firm in St Louis like Parmele Law Firm from the beginning.  Authorities are quick to explain that there are valid reasons for the rigorous nature of the process. First, people need to understand that the social security disability insurance (SSDI) program was designed for low-income persons with a disability (PWDs). The Social Security Administration (SSA) says a person can only get SSDI benefits if they are unable to engage in substantial gainful activity (SGA). SSDI is also a “last resort” for people whose conditions have grown worse despite medical intervention. Therefore, a person who failed to follow doctor’s orders, and suffered worse injuries because of it, will likely be denied. There’s also little chance of receiving SSDI benefits if the disability resulted from alcoholism or substance abuse.

MO Supreme Court Rule 4-7.2 “The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.  The information and materials on this blog are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended to be legal advice. The law changes frequently and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Being general in nature, the information and materials provided may not apply to any specific factual and/or legal set of circumstances. No attorney-client relationship is formed nor should any such relationship be implied. Nothing on this blog is intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney, especially an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction. If you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Past results are no guarantee of future results.